How does seeking asylum work at the US border?

Player utilities

Listen to the full interview.

Three members of a caravan of migrants from Central America embrace and pray near the San Ysidro checkpoint after the first fellow migrants entered U.S. territory to seek asylum, at an improvised shelter in Tijuana, Mexico, on April 30, 2018.

Members of a caravan of migrants from Central America pray near the San Ysidro checkpoint after the first fellow migrants entered US territory to seek asylum, at an improvised shelter in Tijuana, Mexico, on April 30, 2018.

Credit:

Edgard Garrido/Reuters

Under US and international law, people have the right to seek asylum in another country. So the 150 or so Central Americans who traveled north through Mexico in a migrant caravan are perfectly within their rights in waiting to do so at the southern US border.   

For the past few days, they’ve been camping on the ground in Tijuana, Mexico, just outside the San Ysidro port of entry.

“They're making it sound like what people are doing .... arriving and surrendering themselves to start the asylum process, is illegal,” says Houston immigration attorney Mana Yegani of the way US President Donald Trump and his administration have portrayed the group.

That’s not the case, she says, and lawyers worry that the negative rhetoric around the caravan will get in the way of people’s right to the fair process to which they’re legally entitled.

Related: At the US-Mexico border, migrants face uncertain wait

“The one thing that has to be clear is that these people are not openly defying our border. They are not breaking the law,” she says. “In fact they're doing it the right way. They're doing it the way that the law permits to seek asylum like any other refugee in the world.”

So, what exactly happens when one presents themselves at the border? Yegani walked us through the process.

“They will go into custody, which is a fancy way of saying immigration jail," Yegani says. Migrants are willing to go through that process because they fear for their lives, she says.

The asylum-seeker is then put in expedited removal, or deportation proceedings.

During the question and answer session, the asylum-seeker must testify under oath that they have a fear of persecution if they return to their home country, Yegani says. Under international law, she says, “we have a duty not to return a person to a country where they may face torture or other serious harm.”

All of these steps are part of the US’ legal obligations toward asylum-seekers under the UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, also known as the 1951 Refugee Convention.

Next, asylum-seekers’ cases are then referred to a regional asylum office.

“Credible fear” is an asylum law concept where people must demonstrate they fear returning home until their asylum case is processed. Fear can be based on five categories: race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group. Economic factors, such as fleeing poverty, typically don’t pass muster.

Demonstrating credible fear is also not a guarantee they’ll be granted asylum; it merely allows them to move on to the next step in the process. Often an interpreter is on the phone during the interview, along with an attorney if the asylum-seeker has the means to hire one.

“In immigration proceedings, because it's a civil proceeding, the government does not get court-appointed, or free, lawyers,” Yegani says. Some legal services organizations provide pro bono attorneys, but it’s rare.

People remain in detention as they await a credible fear interview.

More: 20 years ago, asylum seekers were not automatically put in immigration detention

If border officials find a person does not have credible fear, they can request a review by an immigration judge. That’s typically where attorneys get involved.

“And that’s why Attorney General Jeff Sessions says these asylum cases are backing up our immigration courts,” Yegani says. “Because when a negative finding of credible fear is found, the person, by law, has a right to request an immigration judge to review their case. And this basically infuriates the attorney general, and he calls immigration lawyers dirty immigration lawyers because we are following the law and allowing for a judicial review of the person's credible fear.”

"The system is being abused to the detriment of the rule of law, sound public policy, public safety, and of just claims," Sessions said in remarks to the Executive Office for Immigration Review on October 2017. EOIR oversees immigration courts.

If the person does demonstrate credible fear, they are sometimes — but not always — released from custody and ordered to appear later before an immigration judge to present their case.

Even that is not a guarantee of being able to stay in the US. The vast majority of Central and South Americans who appear before judges are denied asylum. 

“If the person is granted asylum they will be given a green card one year after the date of approval of their asylum,” Yegani says.

Next: A migrant from El Salvador gets her chance in immigration court

In ImmigrationGlobal Nation.

Tagged: TijuanaUnited StatesCentral AmericaMana YeganiDonald TrumpaslyumcaravanUS-Mexico borderdeportationimmigration courts.