Manning Verdict Echoes Pentagon Papers Call for First Amendment Rights

The Takeaway

Yesterday, a military judge found Private Bradley Manning not guilty of “aiding the enemy” for releasing hundreds of thousands classified military documents to WikiLeaks.
Amidst the mix of rumblings and applause that followed the verdict were the echoes of another case. Four decades ago the publication of the Pentagon Papers, a secret history of the U.S. involvement in Vietnam, led to a similar debate over what constitutes our First Amendment rights.
Floyd Abrams defended the New York Times in the Pentagon Papers case which made it all the way to the Supreme Court. He joins us to discuss the verdict’s impact on the First Amendment.  

Are you with The World?

The story you just read is available to read for free because thousands of listeners and readers like you generously support our nonprofit newsroom. Every day, the reporters and producers at The World are hard at work bringing you human-centered news from across the globe. But we can’t do it without you: We need your support to ensure we can continue this work for another year.

When you make a gift of $10 or more a month, we’ll invite you to a virtual behind-the-scenes tour of our newsroom to thank you for being with The World.