Doctors Debate the Individual Mandate

The Takeaway

All this week, we’re talking about Department of Health and Human Services vs. Florida, the health care case at the Supreme Court. Today the Court will hear arguments on the constitutionality of the individual mandate, the provision of the Affordable Care Act that requires Americans to purchase health insurance. Failure to purchase health insurance could result in a fine. We’ve heard from constitutional scholars and economists for their take on health care reform and the individual mandate, and today we’ll hear from doctors who actually provide the care. Once it’s fully implemented, how will the Affordable Care Act affect physicians? How do doctors think the individual mandate might change patient care? We turn to three doctors this morning who have very different perspectives on the individual mandate. Dr. Rachel Nardin  is  a neurologist at Cambridge Health Alliance and an Assistant Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School. Dr. Kevin Pho  is a primary care physician in Nashua, New Hampshire, and a blogger at  KevinMD.com. Dr. Hal Scherz  is a pediatric urologist and a professor of urology at Emory University School of Medicine. He is also the founder and president of Docs4PatientCare.
  
  

Are you with The World?

The story you just read is available to read for free because thousands of listeners and readers like you generously support our nonprofit newsroom. Every day, the reporters and producers at The World are hard at work bringing you human-centered news from across the globe. But we can’t do it without you: We need your support to ensure we can continue this work for another year.

When you make a gift of $10 or more a month, we’ll invite you to a virtual behind-the-scenes tour of our newsroom to thank you for being with The World.