A robot with human-like features works on an assembly line beside a human worker at a factory of Glory Ltd., a manufacturer of automatic change dispensers, in Kazo, north of Tokyo, Japan, July 1, 2015.

A humanoid robot assembles automatic change dispensers next to a human worker at a factory in Kazo, north of Tokyo, on July 1, 2015. 

Credit:

Issei Kato/Reuters

In his first press conference as the President-elect, Donald Trump boasted that he “will be the greatest jobs producer that God ever created.”

But will those jobs be for humans, or machines?

Automation — or "the creation and application of technology to monitor and control the production and delivery of products and services,” as defined by the International Society of Automation — is poised to shake up the American economy in the long term.

For example, Vivek Wadhwa notes in the Chicago Tribune that the Boston Consulting Group predicts that in 2025, it will cost manufacturers less than $2 per hour to task machines with the work of welding. Compare that to today’s going wage for human welders, $25 per hour, and it is easy to imagine companies choosing to replace living and breathing workers with machines.

Wadhwa points out, as well, that companies like Uber are accelerating the development of self-driving vehicles in order to cut costs. The advent of driverless cars could mean that millions of American workers who drive taxis and trucks for a living will wake up in the next decade and find that their jobs have become obsolete.

Research suggests it would be a mistake to think that only a small portion of the American workforce will be affected by automation. In a report about how Americans perceive the threat of automation to American jobs, Associate Director of Research at Pew Aaron Smith points to a 2013 Oxford University study that found that nearly 50 percent of all American jobs could be performed entierely or in part by machines.  

It’s not just a future problem. Automation is already claiming American jobs.  

In November, Trump called out United Technologies Corp for planning to move production— and about 800 jobs — from a factory in Indiana to Mexico. The company decided to keep their facility in Indiana. But it didn’t save all those American jobs. Instead, United Technologies Corp chose to cut costs by investing in automation and keeping just a portion of the 800 jobs.

“What that ultimately means is there will be fewer jobs,” CEO Greg Hayes said about the company’s move to mechanized labor.

Thomas H. Davenport, author of “Only Humans Need Apply: Winners and Losers in the Age of Smart Machines,” pointed out in the Harvard Business Review that since taking office, Trump has been vocal about many matters of job loss, including companies moving factories overseas, outsourcing, and international trade deals like the North American Free Trade Agreement.

In fact, in his first days in office, Trump stepped away from the Trans-Pacific Partnership deal because he said it was a “job killer,” even though critics have pointed out that if Trump’s decision to pressure companies from moving jobs overseas does in fact create more jobs in the United States, the higher costs of production in the US might actually accelerate automation — which in turn will reduce opportunities for Americans to work.

But Trump has said very little about automation. And instead of addressing the well-documented threat that machines pose to American workers, he has pedaled disproven theories that accuse migrants of taking American jobs.

You say you'll produce more jobs than anyone else. But Mr. President, how will you protect American jobs from automation? Click here to tweet the question to the president.

Over President Donald Trump's roughly first 100 days, we'll be asking him questions that our audience wants answers to. Join the project by tweeting this question to @realDonaldTrump with the hashtag #100Days100Qs. See more of our questions at pri.org/100questions.

Related Stories