Archive: PRI's The World

You've landed on the archive site for PRI's The World. For the most up-to-date content, please visit www.theworld.org


Piracy vs. privacy (2:30)


April 15, 2009
download | permalink | transcript



When President Obama made his first public comments on the rescue of an American cargo shop captain from Somali pirates, he said "...I want to be very clear that we are resolved to halt the rise of privacy in that region." Some have called it a presidential flub, but The World's Jason Margolis says maybe so, but it's not as straightforward as it seems.


Read the Transcript

This text below is a phonetic transcript of a radio story broadcast by PRI's THE WORLD. It has been created on deadline by a contractor for PRI. The transcript is included here to facilitate internet searches for audio content. Please report any transcribing errors to theworld@pri.org. This transcript may not be in its final form, and it may be updated. Please be aware that the authoritative record of material distributed by PRI's THE WORLD is the program audio.


MARCO WERMAN: Some piracy news now. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton today announced plans to freeze pirate assets. It's part of larger attempt to regain control of the waters off the coast of Somalia. Meanwhile, some people are still wondering what President Obama meant when he said this earlier this week.

BARACK OBAMA: And I want to be very clear that we are resolved to halt the rise of privacy in that region.

WERMAN: More now on that presidential utterance from The World's Jason Margolis.

JASON MARGOLIS: Here's late night comedian Jimmy Kimmel.

JIMMY KIMMEL: The president made it very clear that he is committed to stopping piracy, or at least he made it kind of clear.

OBAMA: We are resolved to halt the rise of privacy in that region.

[LAUGHTER]

MARGOLIS: Kimmel's producers really milked the joke by showing some archival video of George W. Bush seemingly joining in the laughter. Over on MSNBC, Joe Scarborough spent a couple of minutes poking fun at President Obama's slip-up. But within minutes, several viewers e-mailed Scarborough and said no, Mr. Obama used the term correctly. Here's Kenneth Kinkor, Project Historian at the Whydah Pirate Museum in Cape Cod, Massachusetts.
KENNETH KINKOR: A privateer is essentially an individual or a company who's been granted a license by the government to go out and attack the shipping of the designated enemy, usually but not always, in time of war.

MARGOLIS: That's clearly not what the men in Somalia were up to. Even if they were privateers, does a privateer engage in privacy? Actually no, says Robert Rotberg at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government.

ROBERT ROTBERG: A privateer engages in "privateering".

MARGOLIS: Rotberg says the President probably just made a slip of the tongue or it was a teleprompter mistake.

ROTBERG: The only way we could demonstrate that he was saying what he wanted to say, it was that he was content to make up a new word, a neologism.

MARGOLIS: The White House hasn't spoken on that possibility. Now, if you were to hear Republican Congressman Ron Paul talking about "privateering", that wouldn't be a slip of the tongue. Paul said this week he wants Congress to hire private citizens to keep international waters safe and engage in “privateering”. Then, in the seas off Somalia it would be pirates vs. privateers. For The World, I'm Jason Margolis.

Copyright ©2008 PRI's THE WORLD. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to PRI's THE WORLD. This transcript may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without prior written permission. For further information, please email The World's Permissions Coordinator at theworld@pri.org.


Home | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Support The World: Shop at Amazon