Activists question Saudi Arabia's commitment to women competing in the Olympics | PRI.ORG
Support PRI's Global Reporting Fund. Support PRI's Global Reporting Fund.

Activists question Saudi Arabia's commitment to women competing in the Olympics

Home | Stories | World | Middle East | Activists question Saudi Arabia's commitment to women competing in the Olympics
email

Email to a friend

 
image
Saudi King Abdullah has supported women's rights in the country, but many believe he is only trying to appease the international community. (Photo by Arcimboldo via Wikimedia Commons.)

Human-rights activists are challenging Saudi Arabia's commitment to allow women athletes to compete in the Olympics after the country's only female candidate was disqualified. Saudi Arabia has never sent women to compete and as a policy, bans women from playing sports.


Listen NowListen Now

This week, the Saudi Arabian embassy in London announced that the kingdom would allow its women athletes to compete in the Olympics for the first time.

However, human-rights activists have challenged Saudi Arabia's commitment after it emerged that the one likely female candidate had been disqualified.

Dalma Malhas, a 20-year-old equestrian, was poised to be Saudi Arabia's first female competitor. She took home the bronze in the 2010 Youth Olympics.

But Monday, the International Equestrian Federation stated that Malhas will not be competing in London because her horse had suffered an injury.

"It is a hundred percent the case they knew she couldn't compete when they made the announcement," Minky Worden of Human Rights Watch told the Wall Street Journal, Tuesday. She also said the Saudi announcement "was total spin for the West."

Human Rights Watch has called for Saudi Arabia to be banned from the London Olympics if the country declines to send women athletes. The organization challenged the country Thursday to adopt new policies supporting Saudi women.

Laura Bashraheel, a journalist with the Saudi Gazette in Jeddah, said the Saudi Olympic Committee has not yet confirmed its sponsorship of women athletes.

She also doubts the validity of the embassy's statement, and with the recent news, it remains unclear whether Saudi women will actually compete in London this summer.

"There's nothing official yet," Bashraheel said. "That's the problem ... there's no official statement, which makes all of us really confused."

The Saudi Olympic Committee's last official statement concerning the participation of women was in April. According to Bashraheel, it said that women may compete, but will not be sponsored by the government.

This means that women "can compete under the Saudi flag but [are] not part of the Saudi Olympic Committee; not officially sent from Saudi Arabia, which makes it very complicated," she said.

According to Human Rights Watch, this spring, the head of Saudi Arabia's Olympic Committee, Prince Nawwaf al-Faisal, said the nation is "not embracing any female Saudi participation in the Olympics."

Saudi Arabia, Brunei and Qatar had been the only three nations to not send women to the 2008 Games. But this summer, Brunei is sending a female hurdler, while Qatar is sending three in shooting, swimming and track.

It's possible that Saudi Arabia may be the only nation to not have women compete.

Though the IEF said there were "a number of other female athletes" under consideration, no name of any other possible Saudi entrant had been put forward by Thursday.

"We haven't received any news about any women competing except Dalma because she's the only one who's competed internationally before," Bashraheel said.

She suggested that international pressure may have played a role in Saudi Arabia's announcement.

"Maybe it's because of international pressure. The thing is, true, we still need to focus on internal issues of sports and allowing women to practice sports," she said.

Saudi Arabia currently has a policy banning women from playing team sports. Human Rights Watch called for the nation to change this policy and others to "create real, systemic change."

Some of the proposed policy changes include eliminating Saudi Arabia's guardianship system, which says that women must obtain permission from a male guardian to work, study, marry or access health care, and eliminating the country's ban on women driving cars.

A group of Saudi women activists are hoping that King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia will help lift the ban barring women from driving.

The activists are encouraging women to get behind the wheel on Friday in the second annual driving protest, Women2Drive.

The movement is led by Manal al Sharif, who was jailed in 2011 after posting a YouTube video of herself driving.

"If women don't take action, the authorities will not lift the ban. It is up to women to decide," she told Reuters.

Saudi King Abdullah has supported expanding women's rights, but the activists are now asking Abdullah to show support by stopping any punishments imposed by the authorities.

As for Saudi Arabia's announcement on women in the Olympics, Al Sharif told The Wall Street Journal it was "to make people happy out there," internationally.

"Not for us," Al Sharif said.

----------------------------------------------------------

"PRI's "The World" is a one-hour, weekday radio news magazine offering a mix of news, features, interviews, and music from around the globe. "The World" is a co-production of the BBC World Service, PRI and WGBH Boston. More about The World.

Found in:   human rights   women's issues   Saudi Arabia   Olympics 2012   London Olympics   Olympic Women   women and sports
email

Email to a friend

 

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (1 posted)

avatar
Lisa 29 June, 2012 08:16:44
This whole argument about Malhas is based on misinformation. First of all, she was not "disqualified." She never qualified to begin with, she never even began trying to qualify until less than 3 months prior to the deadline. That's a last ditch effort. Also, qualification is not the same thing as selection. The FEI has minimum qualifying requirements for all countries; then each country has and additional selection process to determine who will be on their team. These spaces got to the best, not to novices with no experience at the level (eg Malhas). HRW and the press didn't do their homework. If you check the facts, you'll see there are two paths to the Olympics: the normal way being selected/nominated by your NOC as part of the official team (never an option for Malhas regardless of gender policy because the Saudi team was selected a long time ago, and Malhas is nowhere near their level of experience/capability). The other way to get to the Olympics is extraordinary, via an IOC wild card. The IOC policy, reiterated at every turn, has been NO WILD CARDS. Why? Because that is what Saudi wants! That is what was done for the YOG with Malhas, and it worked out great. They got the benefits without having to incorporate her into their official delegation. Saudi WANT Malhas there, on a wild card. That means they don't have to do anything with their other female athletes, in the sports where they do in fact have places. They have no places available in equestrian simply because they have a medal-contending team and Malhas is not at that level (the YOG was at FEI Children's leve, 1.20 meters, normally restricted to 12-14 year old kids. The Olympics are at 1.60 meters, totally different situation; she has NO experience at that level!). Also, Jacques Rogge confirmed the other day that there are two female athletes they expect to be nominated by the Saudi NOC. Sure they could start dithering again or renege, but you, the media, and HRW are writing complete fiction with regard to Malhas. She was always a last resort option for the IOC, if Saudi refused to comply. THEN they would give her a wild card if she could qualify. That is WHY she didn't even begin the bid to qualify until just before the deadline! It's all very simple if you seek facts with an open mind and do your research. The notion that Saudi has somehow been dishonest in announcing their reversal because Malhas wasn't eligible is not getting it...the nominated entries were published a while ago, and her name wasn't on the list, for the reasons stated above. It was already public information that she was not eligible to compete and would not be competing. What Saudi was trying to do in mentioning her is still trying to get the IOC to give her a wild card. That is what it's all about. It's bad enough this very young woman is a political tool for both sides but it would be so much more respectful of her to stick to the facts.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
total: 1 | displaying: 1 - 1

Post your comment

    Bold Italic Underline Quote

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Captcha

JOIN PRI COMMUNITIES:


Rate this article
0