SpaceX rocket launch marks the beginning of the private era in space | PRI.ORG
Support PRI's Global Reporting Fund. Support PRI's Global Reporting Fund.

SpaceX rocket launch marks the beginning of the private era in space

Home | Stories | Science and Technology | SpaceX rocket launch marks the beginning of the private era in space
email

Email to a friend

 
image
The International Space Station has previously only received spaceships flown by government agencies from the United States, Russia, Japan and the European Union. (Photo courtesy of NASA.)

Tuesday's launch of the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket marks the first commercial flight for a spacecraft bound to the International Space Station, perhaps the opening salvo of a new, private era of space exploration.


Listen NowListen Now

The United States, Russia, Japan, the European Union and SpaceX could very soon all be members of a very exclusive club.

If all goes smoothly over the next few days, each entity will have successfully, and at some point historically, brought a vessel to the International Space Station.

On Tuesday, SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket and its unmanned Dragon capsule lifted off en route to the space station, marking the first ever flight of a commercial spacecraft to the space station. The flight could open up a new, private, entrepreneurial era in space.

But what, exactly, is the business of space? And what does the business model look like?

Former NASA astronaut and International Space Station commander Michael Lopez-Alegria said SpaceX’s launch was an important, historic moment. The launch has special importance for the new breed of astronauts — entrepreneurs.

“It was a big moment and sort of just one more step, but a very important one,” Lopez-Alegria said.

The privately funded SpaceX Falcon 9 private sector launch vehicle made its first flyby of the ISS on Thursday, while the old U.S. launch vehicles, the space shuttle fleet, were being delivered to various museums.

Miles O’Brien, science correspondent for PBS NewsHour, said the Falcon 9 has major improvements over public sector and pre-existing space launch and transport vehicles.

“The space shuttle did a lot of things for a lot of people and that made it very complicated, and ultimately, actually very dangerous. There was no crew escape system on the space shuttle. The fragile return vehicle was downstream of debris, which came off the fuel tank, thus that gave us Columbia,” O’Brien said.

“This vehicle is very specific. It’s very simple. It will have crew escape eventually and the vehicle is on top of the stacks,” he noted.

For the time being, the cargo and the crew destination are both the International Space Station. Lopez-Alegria said the space station is very involved with the program a procurement standpoint, but it is much less involved in the development of the program and vehicles.

“The difference between having SpaceX or Orbital design these cargo vehicles, and what you might think when you think of a space shuttle or a space station is that the government wasn’t very involved in the details of the development. They did provide some seed money, but they stayed out of the decision-making process,” he said.

Lopez-Alegria said the private sector space business is a combination of a cargo delivery, satellite delivery and tourism.

He said currently, the program is focused on taking cargo to the International Space Station. The next step is to try to extend its services to the commercial crew world by taking astronauts, NASA, and other partner astronauts to the ISS, a service that is currently being provided by the Russians.

“We would like to bring that service back to the U.S., launching folks on U.S. hardware from U.S. soil, on hardware built by American labor,” Lopez-Alegria said.

O’Brien said private sector astronaut training programs, private sector launch vehicle design programs and space station design programs have been organized.

“There’s a guy by the name of Bigelow out in Las Vegas, who actually has vehicles orbiting the earth right now — inflatable vehicles, which he would one day like to turn into hotels. These are private destinations for the ultimate tourist."

He said it is difficult to predict the future of this new entrepreneurial era of space.

“Think of the people who designed and created what was then called ARPANET versus the entrepreneurs of today, Facebook and others, that give you the Internet. It’s a good analogy — the government engineers versus the entrepreneurs who are exploiting what the government has laid the groundwork for,” O'Brien said. “We’re in the transition from ARPANET to the Internet in space right now. I think having the private enterprise component injected into space, will lead us places we cannot predict."

O'Brien said, though there is always going to be a role for government in space, NASA should focus on heading toward Mars because there's not much demand to travel there.

Lopez-Alegria agreed.

"There’s not much of a business case to get to Mars at least right now, just because the cost to get there is so high. But we’re getting to the point where lower orbit is a place where hopefully, as the flight rate goes up, the prices go down, the demand goes back up, which drives the flight rate up, which drives the prices down. That virtuous cycle is what we’re after," he said.

The capsule cleared a series of tests and maneuvers Thursday in preparation for its docking attempt on Friday. If successful, it could change the future of private exploration in space.

“Obviously going to space involves a whole other host of risks. But, it’s about managing the risks, and certainly, people are going into it with their eyes open, we hope," O'Brien said.

-----------------------------------------------

"The Takeaway" is a national morning news program, delivering the news and analysis you need to catch up, start your day, and prepare for what's ahead. The show is a co-production of WNYC and PRI, in editorial collaboration with the BBC, The New York Times Radio, and WGBH Radio Boston.

Found in:   innovation & technology   science   space   NASA
email

Email to a friend

 

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (2 posted)

avatar
Ivan 25 May, 2012 02:50:27
Wasn't there just an announcement a couple years back about how Earth will not be sending more rockets to space? This is just what I was told,if anyone knows of what I am talking of,I could use some insight. A lot of fuel is put into just one of these rockets;it seems like a rather large waste. No sorry,it is a large waste. This is what is wrong with the human race. Why in the state that our world is in,would any sane and half decent person,want to spend hundreds of thousands,if not millions,of dollars just to spend a night in a hotel 'In Space'. There is Progress to be made in this world. And all these people want to do is feed the fires of our own destruction.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-4
avatar
Brian 25 May, 2012 04:41:28
Ivan, stop talking...just stop. It is misinformed people like you that are the problem. You can't make blanket statements like that when you obviously have no clear understanding of the intricacies of the space program. There are many justifiable reasons why we send rockets into space. In short, the space program creates new business by developing new technologies...many of which you don't even know came from the space program. You wouldn't even have been able to post your stunningly misguided comment online through your wireless internet connection if it weren't for wireless technologies developed for space communication. The space program takes the smartest people and uses them to solve the hardest problems on earth. The global economy eventually reaps the benefits. That is a fact. The problem is that misinformed know-it-alls get an equal say in the debate, when they should just sit quiet and listen when they don't know.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
4
total: 2 | displaying: 1 - 2

Post your comment

    Bold Italic Underline Quote

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Captcha

JOIN PRI COMMUNITIES:


Rate this article
0