New data shows undecided voters view climate change as factor in choosing candidate
Yale's Project on Climate Change Communication set out to see how the environment, specifically global warming, might influence undecided voters. What they found was undecided voters believe in climate change and will consider how a candidate views climate change when casting a ballot.
The economy seems to be the central issue of this year’s presidential contest, but a new study from the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication suggests that global warming could be a hotter topic than anticipated.
In the study, The Yale Project on Climate Change Communication found a broad majority of undecided likely voters — as well as Obama-leaning voters — view climate change as real and want Washington to do more to address it. Geoffrey Feinberg, a co-author of the study, said the researchers decided to pursue these questions because they were interested in how climate change could shift the election.
The study is based on results from 700 likely voters, some seven percent of whom were undecided.
In general, Feinberg said the undecided voters they spoked to resembled supporters of Barack Obama, more than anything else.
"Virtually all of them believe global warming is happening, 80 percent of them, 8 in 10, compared to Obama voters, 86 percent of them believe that it's happening," Feinberg said. "And this is in contrast to likely Romney voters. Fewer than half of them believe that global warming is happening, only 45 percent."
And over half of the undecideds, Feinberg said, indicated that a presidential candidate's position on climate change would influence their decision on who to support.
"Not many say that global warming is the key issue for them, only about one in 20. However, over half, about six in ten, say that it is among the important issues that will help them decide their vote," he said.
And the majority of those voters believe that global warming was caused by human activity, the poll found. Just 20 percent believe it was naturally caused, Feinberg said.
"There is, in fact, a virtual consensus among climate scientists that global warming is happening and there have been a number of academic papers which document this," he said. "And two in three Obama voters understand that. Relatively few Romney voters, 22 percent, believe that there is a consensus and in fact the majority of Romney voters, over half, 57 percent, think there's a lot of confusion and debate among scientists as to whether or not global warming is happening."
A little less than half of the undecideds believe most scientists think global warming is happening and about the same amount, about 42 percent, think there's a lot of disagreement, the poll found.
With undecideds generally believing climate change will be a factor in choosing a president, and the lion's share believing global warming is happening, Feinberg urged both leading candidates to consider carefully how they address the topic.
"I think Mr. Obama might do well to reiterate that he believes global warming is happening, that it's not a hoax, he believes it's human-caused and that we need to find solutions to solve the problem," he said. "Mr. Romney is in a tougher spot because a number of his base either doesn't believe it's happening or doesn't think it's human-caused so I suppose if I were Mr. Romney what I would say is that: look, this is something that needs to be taken very seriously, it's something that Democrats and Republicans need to work on carefully together to ensure that the science is good, to ensure that solutions are good, and that if in fact it is happening, that we need a free market approach to solve the problem."
So far, though, neither candidate is rushing to wrap his candidacy in the flag of fighting global warming.
------------------------------------------------------------
Hosted by Bruce Gellerman, "Living on Earth" is an award-winning environmental news program that delves into the leading issues affecting the world we inhabit. More "Living on Earth."





"As environmental science has advanced, it has become apparent that the human appetite for animal flesh is a driving force behind virtually every major category of environmental damage now threatening the human future: deforestation, erosion, fresh water scarcity, air and water pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss, social injustice, the destabilization of communities, and the spread of disease." Worldwatch Institute, "Is Meat Sustainable?"
"The livestock sector emerges as one of the top contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global. The findings of this report suggest that it should be a major policy focus when dealing with problems of land degradation, climate change and air pollution, water shortage and water pollution, and loss of biodiversity. The impact is so significant that it needs to be addressed with urgency." UN Food and Agricultural Organization's report "Livestock's Long Shadow"
“If every American skipped one meal of chicken per week and substituted vegetables and grains... the carbon dioxide savings would be the same as taking more than half a million cars off of U.S. roads.” Environmental Defense Fund
Why would someone choose to be vegan? To slow global warming for one! Here are two uplifting videos to help everyone understand why so many people are making this life affirming choice: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKr4HZ7ukSE and http://www.veganvideo.org
"Nothing will benefit human health and increase the chances for survival of life on earth as much as the evolution to a vegetarian diet." ~ Albert Einstein
*Occupywallstreet does not even mention CO2 in its list of demands because of the bank-funded carbon trading stock markets run by corporations.
*Obama has not mentioned the crisis in the last two State of the Unions addresses.
*Julian Assange is of course a climate change denier.
*Canada killed Y2Kyoto with a freely elected climate change denying prime minister and nobody cared, especially the millions of scientists warning us of unstoppable warming (a comet hit).
Meanwhile, the entire world of SCIENCE, lazy copy and paste journalism and Liberal progressivism had allowed bank-funded and corporate-run "CARBON TRADING STOCK MARKETS"(ruled by trustworthy politicians) to trump the UN's and entire world's efforts into 3rd world fresh water relief, starvation rescue and 3rd world education for just over 26 years of insane attempts at climate CONTROL.
Post your comment