Californians set to vote on bill requiring labeling of genetically modified foods | PRI.ORG

Californians set to vote on bill requiring labeling of genetically modified foods

Home | Stories | Science and Technology | Environment | Californians set to vote on bill requiring labeling of genetically modified foods
email

Email to a friend

 
image
Supporters of California's Proposition 37 are trying to require labeling of almost any food sold in California that contains genetically modified organisms. (Photo by Shira Golding.)

Voters in California in November will be able to vote on whether food sold in the state that contains genetically modified organisms must be labeled as such. The implications are vast, with approval likely leading to a national drive for labeling and perhaps to higher food costs.


Listen NowListen Now

Californians in November will vote on a measure that would require manufacturers to label food containing genetically modified organisms.

Prop 37, as it's called, has pitted agribusiness giants Monsanto, Nestle and Kellogg against groups like the Organic Consumers Fund, Cliff Bar and Dr. Bronner's Magic Soap. Richard Frank, director of the California Environmental Law and Policy Center, says proponents of Proposition 37 argue the science underlying genetically engineered food remains uncertain and Californians deserve to know what it is they're eating.

"In the United States the effort to label or disclose genetically engineered food has not gone too far," Frank said. "Internationally it has — many nations already require this. They emphasize that what they are proposing and what the initiative requires is disclosure, rather than a ban on genetically engineered food."

Opponents of the bill say there's no scientific basis for concern, that no scientific studies have demonstrated major health problems associated with genetically engineered food.

They also argue that if regulation is needed, it should be pursued at the national level and, as it is, if the measure is passed it will lead to dramatically higher food prices for Californians, Frank said.

"Most raw foods that you would buy in the vegetable or produce bin at the local market would be covered, as well as the vast majority of processed foods, everything from cereals to bread and that sort of thing," Frank said. "Most food that consumers would find on their grocery shelves."

But not everything is covered. For example, milk and dairy products made from cows that are fed genetically modified food wouldn't have to be labeled as containing such.

"Two other exemptions are for food that is served in restaurants in California and also there's an exemption for alcoholic beverages," Frank said. "Politics is always the art of the possible and it may be that the initiative proponents didn't want to take on too many lobbies and business groups at one time."

While California voters are the only ones headed to the polls, it's almost universally agreed that success in California will lead to labeling requirements expanding across the country, and perhaps even nationally.

"That is one of the objectives of the proponents and it is certainly a major concern, if not fear, of the opponents of Proposition 37," Frank said.

Opponents of the bill have spent some $25 million in an effort to beat back the proposition, while proponents have spent only some 10 percent of that. But still, Frank said he thinks the vote will be close.

"The early polls suggest that Californians were in support of the measure by a three to one margin. I think as a result of the imbalance of campaign funds on either side, I think that gap is going to narrow considerably," Frank said.

------------------------------------------------------------

Hosted by Bruce Gellerman, "Living on Earth" is an award-winning environmental news program that delves into the leading issues affecting the world we inhabit. More "Living on Earth."

Found in:   food   environment   elections   science   agriculture   California
email

Email to a friend

 

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (1 posted)

avatar
Imamowensulivan 10 December, 2012 07:47:20
There are so many problems with genaticelly engineered animals and vegetables. Where to begin?When this became a reality under George Bush's administration,(not George W.- his father) resided over by his Vice President, there was a clear decision not to allow anyone to know anything about the details. Patents were bandied about. Shrimp genes in tomatoes, human genes in other vegetables. So you want to eat humans? Remember, genes are actual biological realities. They give you the make up of who you are.. eye color/hair color. I will skip the canabalism.Secondly, how do people with religiously or ethically based diets protect their food sources? Is a tomato kosher if it has shrimp genes in it? Is it halal for the Islamic community? (You know the halal designation only exists for meat. Until now, I guess) How about the pork genes in vegetables? No one will tell you which is which. So, where is the outcry by the clerics? If you don't have to pay attention to the shrimp and pork genes (an human genes- are humans kosher and halal?), why not just chow down on any animal flesh? Where is the distinction? If part of a tomato or a goat is human, the religious community has to answer some tough questions.How about that separation of church and state? Isn't the government making choices for people's religious practices by withholding this information? Has not the government decided that these religious or ethical tenets are unimportant?Personally, I already was a vegan. Made me into a vegan who eats only organic food. I want to know what I am eating. I think it is my right as an American.P.S. The interesting part was that as soon as we went organic, both my husband and I lost 25 pounds each, without any other change in our diets. Makes you wonder about the multi-billion dollar diet industry and the FDA and USDA hmmmP.P.S. The first patent for a genaticelly engineering organism was a bacteria. You see no normal cell will allow the invasion of a foreign gene unless you destroy it with this bacteria.The scientist will tell you that this is just the centuries old process of grafting fruits and vegetables together speeded up a bit. I think not.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
total: 1 | displaying: 1 - 1

Post your comment

    Bold Italic Underline Quote

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Captcha
Follow Listen Support PRI's Global Reporting: Important Stories Powerful Storytelling
Rate this article
0
Support PRI's Global Reporting: Important Stories Powerful Storytelling