Republicans, Democrats, come out strongly against negative Obama ad campaign | PRI.ORG
Support PRI's Global Reporting Fund. Support PRI's Global Reporting Fund.

Republicans, Democrats, come out strongly against negative Obama ad campaign

Home | Stories | Politics and Society | Republicans, Democrats, come out strongly against negative Obama ad campaign
email

Email to a friend

 
image
Reverend Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., pastor of Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ, speaks at a breakfast at the National Press Club in Washington April 28, 2008. (Photo by Larry Downing/Reuters.)

Early Thursday the New York Times reported word of an ad campaign being considered by a major conservative donor. It would have tried to tie President Barack Obama to controversial pastor Jeremiah Wright. But just as fast as the story broke, Republicans and Democrats condemned it and the project was quickly cancelled.


Listen NowListen Now

The political world was up in arms Thursday morning over a report of an ad campaign under consideration by a Republican Super PAC targeting President Barack Obama and his ties to Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

The ad campaign was first reported by The New York Times.

But just as quickly as the story emerged it died, after Joe Ricketts, a major Republican donor, TD Ameritrade founder and owner of the Chicago Cubs, said the ad campaign won't move forward. Ricketts was the money behind the ad campaign for the Ending Spending Super PAC, and was floating the idea of the campaign in order to judge what public reaction would be.

Rick Klein, senior Washington correspondent for ABC World News, said the reaction he got was swift, fierce and almost exclusively negative. Even Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican challenger to Obama, rejected the ad and any ad that made a personal attack on Obama's background.

"There were McCain advisers who wanted desperately to use the Rev. Wright videos and sermons, and Sarah Palin was in that camp, against President Obama four years ago," Klein said. "They were turned down by the candidate himself."

Because the videos had already surfaced during the previous campaign, there wasn't a lot of new material that would have gone into the ad campaign.

Klein said it was repurposing and reminding people of video they very likely saw four years ago.

"One of the reasons there were so many Republicans hesitant to go there was they weren't sure it would work," Klein said. "One key element we've seen from the Romney campaign so far is they don't actually mind if you like President Obama, they just don't want you to vote for him. So any personal attack may backfire."

The Romney campaign wants to keep the focus on the economy, Klein said.

With this campaign stopped before it could even get out of the gate, Klein said Ricketts, a registered independent, will probably shift his focus to the fiscal issues that he's passionate about. He's still likely to spend millions of dollars bankrolling opposition to Obama's re-election, but the campaigns will probably focus more on his spending practices.

"He wants President Obama to be defeated, but he doesn't want it to be over these kind of social of cultural, divisive issues," Klein said.

Even so, with all of the press that this potential campaign has received, some of its goals have already been met. After all, the media is once more talking about Rev, Jeremiah Wright.

-----------------------------------------------------

, from WBUR in Boston, is an essential midday news magazine for those who want the latest news and expanded conversation on today's hot-button topics.

Found in:   politics & society   elections   USA   Obama   politics
email

Email to a friend

 

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (1 posted)

avatar
Sean 19 May, 2012 06:48:14
With respects, I wonder, did the President or anyone from his campaign have no comments to offer, about the matter? This article seems as though it was skewed for the Romney camp, and I see no comments mentioned from or about the Obama campaign, other than that the President's campaign is what the advertisement was directed against.

I would simply like to see a balanced view about the matter - like, if we're going to mention one campaign, and cater to their personalities, can we not be fair enough to include the other campaign in the discussion, too? I'm certain that someone in the Obama campaign would be able to comment about it.

Finally, though, I'm just glad that someone had the good sense to pull the advert. Maybe it serves to demonstrate that the political climate has not given everything over to the emotional approach.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
total: 1 | displaying: 1 - 1

Post your comment

    Bold Italic Underline Quote

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Captcha

JOIN PRI COMMUNITIES:


Rate this article
0