Presidential debate arrives where roots of financial crisis can be traced
When President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney debate Monday night in Boca Raton, they'll be doing so, almost literally, in the shadow of the housing crisis and economic collapse. While the topic of the debate is foreign policy, Boca is where the financial products that built up the housing bubble were conceived.
A group of young J.P. Morgan bankers met for a weekend retreat in the South Florida city of Boca Raton.
It was that weekend in June 1994 when bankers from J.P. Morgan's swap department conceived of credit derivatives, a creative financial tool that would allow banks to loan money with almost no risk.
We now know that credit derivatives helped hasten the housing crash, which led to the financial crash that has taken us to the recession we're currently fighting our way out of. As Gillian Tett, assistant editor of The Financial Times, details in her book "Fool’s Gold: How the Bold Dream of a Small Tribe at J. P. Morgan Was Corrupted by Wall Street Greed and Unleashed a Catastrophe," the retreat included hard-core drinking, partying, and, eventually, brainstorming that delivered these derivatives to market.
The financial crisis comes full circle Monday night, back to Boca Raton, where President Barack Obama and Republican Presidential nominee Mitt Romney will go head-to-head in their final debate, at Lynn University.
But don't expect that little history lesson to be front-and-center for the two candidates — in fact, this debate is supposed to be exclusively about foreign policy. But the economy, no doubt, will find its way into the discussion, just as foreign policy intruded on what was supposed to be a domestic debate earlier this month.
Tett says societies across the world create spaces in their lives, in time and geography, where people can step away from the hustle of day-to-day, and think about what's happened and what's to come. Boca Raton, she said, is one of those places.
"Boca Raton has served that purpose for the modern investment banking world and sometimes the political world too," she said, "by providing a retreat for people to step out of their usual rat race. To pause, and think, and discuss important themes."
That's exactly what debate moderators hope Obama and Romney will do: discuss important themes. Boca Raton has particular resonance to the debate, because of Florida's economic struggles since the housing market collapsed. That collapse, Tett has shown, can be tracked back to Boca Raton and the J.P. Morgan bankers. In other words, the technology for turning mortgages tied to houses into financial instruments that tie to homes in only the abstract sense, Tett said, was very much conceived at that 1994 meeting — and later in the decade.
"The reality is, these really extraordinary financial innovations and some of the excess we saw in the last decade, are things that are still very much weighing on the economy," she said.
Tett says the irony of all of this is that, originally, the people who created these credit derivatives set out to make the financial system safer — not build the shifty foundation that led to the economic collapse.
"Unfortunately, like so many innovations, those credit derivatives spun out of control and were taken on very much by other people, not the original developers, to create the excesses which damaged the economy in a very major way," Tett said.
-----------------------------------------------
"The Takeaway" is a national midday news magazine that features unique conversations about topics of the day with both newsmakers and diverse voices. The show is a co-production of WNYC and PRI, in editorial collaboration with the BBC, The New York Times Radio, and WGBH Radio Boston.





the Pacific, the aftermath of the Arab Springs, and where we are after our debacles in Iraq and Afghanistan. I expect the veteran CBS correspondent and FACE THE NATION anchor Bob Schrieffer to touch on all of the above topics.
Mitt Romney said recently that a "strong U.S. military is a catalyst of peace," and that view is contrary to John F. Kennedy's view who argued that: "The basic problems facing the world today are not susceptible to military solutions, " on quote. And he said that at the peak of the Cold War era! Today, after Vietnam. Iraq and Afghanistan, anyone who sees the U.S. military a s a vanguard of global peace belongs in a chicken coop - not in the White House! General William Westmorland said during the Vietnam war: "We will blast them back into the stone age," but we achieved nothing, and they saddled us with the Vietnam Syndrome. General George Patton said: "I do like to see the arms and legs fly." Well, we have made plenty of " arms and legs fly" in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan with airstrikes and with predator drones. We are leaving empty-handed after 10 years, and that slaughter has brought us plenty of hatred in the Muslim world. Do we want an encore?
The presidential candidates debate on foreign policy tonight should be a cleat-cut victory for Obama because Romney is totally clueless about foreign policy. He would depend solely on rehearsals by his staff on hot button issues that the republican newspapers have labeled as Obama's shortcomings. But match Obama's 4-year experience in foreign policy, and that equals a B.A. degree in international politics and diplomacy, whereas Romney comes on the debate as a clueless high school graduate with a homework on the subject prepared by others - which is equivalent to someone having bought a term-paper he couldn't write himself for his class from an internet vendor!
From my own watching tower, I see Mitt Romney as a George W. Bush student and accolade, and as a warmonger just a shade below the most infamous warmongering politician, the late Barry Goldwater! I expect plenty of finger-pointing to be "the hallmark of the debate, " as I expect to hear a lot of boasting by both candidates about keeping the U.S. as a superpower above all other nations, and Iran to become the whipping boy of the evening. Beyond that, I expect only abstract or murky answers on anything else. After all, by this time most voters have had a sensory overload of campaign rhetoric, and see this debate as a laundry machine on the last wringing spin! Nikos Retsos, retired professor
Post your comment