Informant who lied about WMDs goes public | PRI.ORG

Informant who lied about WMDs goes public

Home | Stories | Politics and Society | Government | Informant who lied about WMDs goes public
email

Email to a friend

 
image
Computer simulation of a WMD facility which was presented by Colin Powell at the UN Security Council. (Photo courtesy of the US Department of State/Wikimedia).

Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi is better known by his CIA codename: Curveball. Janabi was a CIA informant whose falsified account of WMDs led the US to invade Iraq. Janabi will make a public appearance in a BBC documentary entitled "Modern Spies."


Listen NowListen Now

Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi, who openly admitted to fabricating intelligence about the presence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, is breaking his silence with appearances in a BBC documentary that began airing this past Sunday and will conclude next Sunday.

Janabi said he saw weapons development sites in Iraq in 2003. His testimony was cited by Secretary of Defense Colin Powell to justify to the United Nations Joint Security Council the American-led invasion of Iraq.

"Every statement I make today is backed up by sources," Powell said. "Solid sources. These are not assertions. What we are giving you are facts and conclusions based on solid intelligence. The source was an eyewitness."

That witness was Janabi.

In the BBC interviews however, Janabi admits he was not an eyewitness. When asked by Michael Rudin, the producer of "Modern Spies," if he fabricated intelligence including drawings and models of mobile WBD laboratories, Janabi's answer was simple: yes.

According to Rudin, Janabi gave false testimony in hopes of forcing Saddam Hussein from power.

"He said that his aim was to get rid of an evil dictator. He says 'my main purpose was to topple the tyrant in Iraq.' And he makes the argument that so many people have suffered under his oppression," Rudin said.

Rudin said Janabi was a German source, and his intelligence was gathered by the German Federal Intelligence Service, the BND.

"The Germans held him very tight," Rudin said. "The CIA only got around to interviewing Curveball, this man that was absolutely central to the case for war, after the war. Not till a year after did they actually get around to interviewing him."

According to Rudin, Janabi's reports of WMD labs were not scrutinized because intelligence officials wanted to believe they were credible.

"No one could quite work out where these big manufacturing plants were, so the question was 'they must be moving it around.' When Janabi starts talking about how they have mobile laboratories that could do it, that suddenly seemed to fit all together perfectly. Because he was saying things that people wanted to believe, it was so much easier to go along with it."

After the 2003 invasion, U.S. officials searching for WMDs reported finding two of the mobile labs Janabi had described. On further inspection, however, the labs were recognized as trailers equipped with hydrogen tanks used to inflate weather balloons.

In the BBC documentary, Powell’s former chief of staff, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson was also interviewed. Wilkerson said Janabi's information was convenient for a plan that was already being put into action.

"intelligence was being worked to fit around the policy," Wilkerson said. 

"Everything that could go wrong went wrong, and yet (Janabi's intelligence) was absolutely essential for the case for war," Rudin said. "There could not have been a more important human source to have checked out and double check, and those checks were never made."

An excerpt from a Guardian interview with Janabi can be viewed on their website.

-----------------------------------------------

"The Takeaway" is a national morning news program, delivering th

Found in:   bbc   politics & society   weapons of mass destruction   Iraq   CIA   war
email

Email to a friend

 

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (1 posted)

avatar
Brad Spencer 05 April, 2012 05:19:23
I wonder if anyone will ever, EVER, EVER think to interview a person who does biological fermentation professionally. Someone who might look at the drawings - and the photos of the trailers in Iraq - and say whether what is seen in any way looks like a real fermentation system. Someone who might say that for fermentation or practically any biological process the temperature is a vital parameter - and then point out that there is no indication of any temperature control on the drawings. The cooling system on the trailers in Iraq was just that and only that - not temperature control. Even the most careless brewer of the cheapest beer would have better control than any ever shown for the supposed sophisticated fermentation systems in Iraq. Or will interviews always and forever be with pundits who have zero technical background?
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
total: 1 | displaying: 1 - 1

Post your comment

    Bold Italic Underline Quote

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Captcha
Follow Listen Support PRI's Global Reporting: Important Stories Powerful Storytelling
Rate this article
1.00
Support PRI's Global Reporting: Important Stories Powerful Storytelling