Comprehensive government accountability investigation finds pervasive corruption risk | PRI.ORG
Support PRI's Global Reporting Fund. Support PRI's Global Reporting Fund.

Comprehensive government accountability investigation finds pervasive corruption risk

Home | Stories | Politics and Society | Government | Comprehensive government accountability investigation finds pervasive corruption risk
email

Email to a friend

 
image
Former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich shakes hands with supporters after making a statement to reporters outside his Chicago home on March 14, 2012, one day before reporting to federal prison in Colorado to serve a 14-year sentence for corruption. Illi

When it comes to risk of corruption, not all states are created equal. A new 50-state investigation found that no state does exceptionally well when it comes to having laws and practices that discourage corruption. And some states do extremely poorly.

A year-long investigation into the risk of corruption across all 50 U.S. states culminated Monday morning with the release of corruption risk report cards by the State Integrity Invesgtigation.

In it, not a single state was determined to merit an A in terms of minimizing the risk of corruption. And 25 of 50 states got either a D or an F for their laws and practices. The State Integrity Investigation is a joint project of the Center for Public Integrity, Global Integrity and Public Radio International, the operator of this website.

The individual grades, though, can mask the individual areas of success and failure in each state. Take Georgia for example. While the state got a 49, an F, the lowest score given, it had areas where its performance wasn't so bad. Like internal auditing. In that area, it scored an 86, good enough for a B and a tie for 37th place. Auditing, though, is an area where most states did well, with just five Cs and one F being handed out.

So, without delay, a top five and bottom five list of selected scores from the State Integrity Investigation. In the case of ties, we included all states with the necessary score to make the cut.

Overall (Top 5)

State, Score

New Jersey, 87

Nebraska, 80

Overall (Bottom 5)

State, Score

Georgia, 49

South Dakota, 50

Wyoming, 52

Virginia, 55

Maine, 56

Redistricting (Top 5):

State, Score

California, 100

Connecticut, 100

Florida, 100

Idaho, 100

Iowa, 100

Mississippi, 100

Vermont, 100

Washington, 100

Wyoming, 100

Redistricting (Bottom 5)

State, Score

Kentucky, 5

New Hampshire, 10

Wisconsin, 15

North Dakota, 25

Ohio, 30

Lobbying (Top 5)

State, Score,

North Carolina, 96

California, 92

Washington, 91

New Jersey, 90

Nebraska, 88

Lobbying (Bottom 5)

State, Score,

North Dakota, 35

Wyoming, 36

Virginia, 41

Delaware, 42

South Dakota, 49

Procurement (Top 5)

State, Score

Iowa, 93

Nebraska, 93

West Virginia, 93

New Jersey, 92

North Dakota, 92

Procurement (Bottom 5)

State, Score

Maryland, 60

Georgia, 65

South Dakota, 66

New York, 66

New Mexico, 70

Arizona, 70

Executive accountability (Top 5)

State, Score

New Jersey, 88

Tennessee, 85

California, 83

New Hampshire, 82

Washington, 82

West Virginia, 82

Executive accountability (Bottom 5)

State, Score

South Carolina, 47

Maine, 50

Idaho, 52

South Dakota, 54

Wyoming, 56

Found in:   politics & society   nonprofits   ethics   government   USA
email

Email to a friend

 

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (1 posted)

avatar
S 21 March, 2012 10:34:02
First the corruption report last month that showed Blagojevich’s own Illinois (and Chicago) leading the pack, and Florida trailing not far behind…now this State Integrity report. I’m sure the previous month’s “winners” are glad to have not taken the crown this time around. But seriously, I truly hope these reports lead to much needed change. If the public takes these findings seriously and subsequently starts demanding that our leaders be held accountable then I’m sure some long-lasting improvements may result from the harsh truths revealed by the data presented in these reports. The corruption, lack of integrity, and lack of accountability is both sad and endemic. On a related note, a jurisdiction in Florida is now inadvertently setting itself up for an election fiasco that involves a corrupt judge who has several co-conspirators. You can’t make this stuff up...unfortunately it's 100% true and corroborated by two reports and extensive irrefutable evidence that is in the possession of agencies, including those within Florida's 8th Judicial Circuit (and Chief Judge Martha Lott and Chief Investigator Spencer Mann). The judge, and former prosecutor, at the heart of the issue is David P. Kreider. Take a look at

http://www.complaints.com/2012/march/14/Corrupt_Judge_David_P._Kreider_now_taints_the_ele_264712.htm

for more information. I say prison sentences for all those who think they are above the law, especially public servants whom we should be able to trust. Then and only then will the governmental paradigm undergo the shift that is so dearly needed. Unfortunately the lack of ethics, lack of honor, and lack of concern for one’s fellow man has infected governments worldwide on both an institutional and cultural level.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
total: 1 | displaying: 1 - 1

Post your comment

    Bold Italic Underline Quote

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Captcha

JOIN PRI COMMUNITIES:


Rate this article
0