Governors ask feds to reclassify marijuana as medicine; government balks | PRI.ORG
Support PRI's Global Reporting Fund. Support PRI's Global Reporting Fund.

Governors ask feds to reclassify marijuana as medicine; government balks

Home | Stories | Health and Medicine | Governors ask feds to reclassify marijuana as medicine; government balks
email

Email to a friend

 
image
American Cannabis Indica purchased at a Medical Cannabis dispensary. (Photo by Mjpresson via Wikimedia Commons, cc-by-sa.)

Two governors want the federal government to "down-schedule" marijuana as a drug with approved medical uses. But the Health and Human Services administration is resisting. Opponents of down-scheduling say there are marijuana-based medications already on the market that are safe and effective.


Listen NowListen Now

 

Govs. Christine Gregoire of Washington and Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island want the federal government to reclassify marijuana as a drug with accepted medical uses.

Currently, marijuana is categorized with heroin and LSD, drugs that are considered to have no medical use. The governors, a Democrat and a Republican-turned-Independent, would like it moved into the same category as opium and morphine, in recognition of the growing medical marijuana industries that have grown up, legal under state law, in their states.

Kevin Sabet, former Senior Adviser to the director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, said the problem is that medicine and medical decisions are made by the Food and Drug Administration, based on studies and science. For Sabet, medical marijuana is a creation of the ballot box and has not been given the level of scrutiny it would need in order to be an accepted medical treatment.

"What the governors did yesterday is really pass the buck to the feds to dodge this highly volatile issue," Sabet said.

In fact, Sabet said, rescheduling the drug would do nothing to enable doctors to prescribe medical marijuana. It would still need to be approved by the FDA for human use. At this point, the FDA plays no role in regulating or monitoring the existing medical marijuana industry in states. But that's not to say the FDA is completely shut off from any marijuana use in medicine.

"There are already marijuana-derived medications that have been approved and are therefore scheduled lower," he said.

According to Sabet, there are two or three medications that are on the market here, including a mouth spray, that are vastly safer and more legitimate than someone smoking marijuana they bought at a medical marijuana dispensary.

"Marijuana can be medicine, and we can derive medicine from it, but it needs to be done in a standardized form," Sabet said. "There's no way the FDA could approve a marijuana joint to be medicine."

Sabet said that the FDA recently completed an "exhaustive" study of the use of marijuana in medicine and the scientists unanimously recommended to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius that marijuana not be rescheduled.

"The FDA has never approved a drug that has all different kinds of unknown compounds and components," he said.

As a comparison, Sabet said we'd never tell people to chew willow bark to get the effects of Aspirin. Instead, aspirin is developed and refined in the lab and then served in tablet form.

He advocates the same approach to treatments based on marijuana.

 

-----------------------------------------------

"The Takeaway" is a national morning news program, delivering the news and analysis you need to catch up, start your day, and prepare for what's ahead. The show is a co-production of WNYC and PRI, in editorial collaboration with the BBC, The New York Times Radio, and WGB

Found in:   health & medicine   illegal drugs   science
email

Email to a friend

 

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (2 posted)

avatar
strayan 23 June, 2012 12:39:19
Let me remind readers that Kevin Sabet, former Senior Adviser to the director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy (not a medical doctor), presided over what is, without dispute, the biggest public health policy failure in the history of mankind - the policy of drug prohibition. Why are we still listening?

Why does PRI think we should then start taking medical advice from some career prohibitionist when my own doctor (yes, that's right, a REAL MEDICAL DOCTOR) has recommend medical marijuana because of its superior safety profile and efficacy?

Why not try the Californian Medical Association? Their official policy explicitly urges the legalisation of medical marijuana on a Federal level. Here's a direct link to their website: http://www.cmanet.org/news/detail?article=cma-urges-legalization-and-regulation-of

Who are you going trust, Kevin Sabet (architect/profiteer of drug prohibition) or a body of highly respected medical doctors?
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
avatar
darkcycle 23 June, 2012 09:51:13
Isn't the FDA's job to test NEW medications for safety and efficacy? Marijuana has been in use for four thousand years with a perfect safety record. It's efficacy isn't even questioned anymore, even hard core prohibitionists and the government acknowledge it. Our government provides Medical Marijuana, in the form of PRE-ROLLED JOINTS for SMOKING to Patients right now. Just ask Irv Rosenfeld. Now, if I'm wrong about marijuana being exempt from FDA approval, perhaps you can show me where the documents exist detailing their testing and approval of Aspirin?
Kevin Sabet is the official apologist for this government's policies. He can be relied upon to lie and twist the truth at every turn. It's the only job he's ever held, and it's the only thing he knows how to do. He's not even very convincing.
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
total: 2 | displaying: 1 - 2

Post your comment

    Bold Italic Underline Quote

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Captcha

JOIN PRI COMMUNITIES:


Rate this article
0