Disputed art disappears from University of Wyoming campus | PRI.ORG
Support PRI's Global Reporting Fund. Support PRI's Global Reporting Fund.

Disputed art disappears from University of Wyoming campus

Home | Stories | Arts and Entertainment | Arts | Disputed art disappears from University of Wyoming campus
email

Email to a friend

 
image
British artist Chris Drury's "Carbon Sink" sculpture was on the University of Wyoming's campus for less than a year. (Photo courtesy of Chris Drury.)

Last year, British artist Chris Drury installed a controversial sculpture on the University of Wyoming's campus. The 36-foot-diameter vortex of logs killed by pine beetles atop a bed of Wyoming coal was a representation of the state's energy sector and the damage wrought by climate change. It didn't last a year.


Listen NowListen Now

It's easy to overlook public art — until it suddenly disappears. 

Penn State removed its statue of the late football coach Joe Paterno last month after a huge outcry both for and against keeping it. Last year, Maine's governor made the controversial decision to remove a mural that celebrated the labor movement that was housed at the state's Department of Labor.

A year ago, the University of Wyoming Art Museum commissioned an outdoor sculpture from British artist Chris Drury. "Carbon Sink" was a 36-foot-diameter vortex of logs killed by pine beetles atop a bed of Wyoming coal. 

Drury said he wanted to draw a connection between Wyoming's extractive industries and the damage wrought by climate change, which experts said had created a devastating pine beetle infestation across the West. 

After this year's commencement — less than a year later — the sculpture was gone. The logs put in a scrap heap, and the coal thrown into the university's power plant.

"I thought it was a little hypocritical to use carbon dollars to fund an anti-carbon sculpture," said Tom Lubnau, the Republican majority leader of the Wyoming House of Representatives. 

Lubnau represents the City of Gillette, the center of the Wyoming's coal and natural gas region. He notes that between 60 to 80 percent of the state's budget — and by extension, the university's budget — comes from taxes on the energy sector. 

Lubnau's comment got play in the New York Times and elsewhere, something he said was "surprising," since in his mind, he was just pointing out the obvious. He denied that lawmakers demanded the removal of the sculpture. 

"It was always meant to be temporary," Lubnau said.

But Jeffrey Lockwood, a University of Wyoming professor who has written about the controversy, said the statue's removal "was a political response to political pressure." "Carbon Sink" was intended to remain in place until it had eroded entirely.

In a recent bill, the Wyoming legislature gave the university's energy resources council, an industry group, right of approval over art going up in the the newly renovated recreation center. Lubnau said he didn't see a problem with that. 

"What's wrong with allowing … (the) industry (to) have approval, or the veto power on a few pieces of art in this one building?" he asked. 

Lockwood sees the opposition to the work as ironic. He said the sculpture was not meant as an attack on the energy sector. Producers and consumers alike, he says, are "all culpable with regard to climate change."

----------------------------------------------------

PRI's Peabody Award-winning "Studio 360 with Kurt Andersen" from WNYC is public radio's smart, surprising guide to what's happening in pop culture and the arts. Each week, Kurt introduces you to the people who are creating and shaping our culture. Let Studio 360 steer you to the must-see movie, the next book for your nightstand, or the song that will get stuck in your ear.

Found in:   climate change   visual arts   energy   USA   art   coal
email

Email to a friend

 

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (1 posted)

avatar
Mira 02 September, 2012 03:30:56
Wyoming's position is to stand bhiend the MW. Not sure if anything too major happens. The merger with CUSA doesn't do much for me and doesn't in my opinion give both BCS access. I don't see anyone leaving, I really don't. Not much UW can do. I can tell you no one is after them or wanting to get rid of them in the MW. If the CUSA merger helps then I'm fine with it but I don't see how it does. Both leagues have similar TV deals. Combining forces may just split too many pieces of the pie. From UW's take with their size and budget there isn't a ton it can do to control any of this.RG
Reply Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
total: 1 | displaying: 1 - 1

Post your comment

    Bold Italic Underline Quote

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Captcha

JOIN PRI COMMUNITIES:


Rate this article
0