The United Nations Security Council has so far been unable to organize a response to the crisis in Syria.
Secretary of State John Kerry’s so-called diplomatic accident, which made the relinquishment of Syrian chemical weapons an option to avert military action, has resulted in intense negotiations at the Security Council. Kerry and his Russian counterpart, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, are discussing a proposal by Russia today in Geneva.
The proposal has other Security Council members talking.
“It is an interesting proposal, if it is a serious one, then it’s one that we should take very seriously because it could achieve a major goal we have as a government–to get rid of chemical weapons,” explained Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron to British members of parliament.
But there is tension between Russia and the Western permanent members of the Security Council as to whether the demands should be presented as a binding U.N. resolution with the threat of military action.
If the Security Council fails to act, its very legitimacy could be at stake.
Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nancy Soderberg, says we should not lose sight of how to bring the civil war to an end in Syria, and that trying to get a resolution on chemical weapons through the United Nations Security Council is an exercise in futility.
The story you just read is available to read for free because thousands of listeners and readers like you generously support our nonprofit newsroom. Every day, the reporters and producers at The World are hard at work bringing you human-centered news from across the globe. But we can’t do it without you: We need your support to ensure we can continue this work for another year.
When you make a gift of $10 or more a month, we’ll invite you to a virtual behind-the-scenes tour of our newsroom to thank you for being with The World.