On Friday, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to hear Bluman v. the Federal Election Commission. This case specifically challenges the Federal Election Campaign Act, which “prohibits any foreign national from contributing, donating or spending funds in connection with any federal, state, or local election in the United States, either directly or indirectly.” The law is broad enough to disallow those lawfully living in the U.S. from distributing re-election materials. Using a First Amendment challenge, the case raises questions about the rights and opinions of non-citizens who lawfully reside here. Jeff Rosen is a law professor at George Washington University. He discusses judicial and legislative history behind the ban on political contributions from foreign nationals. Paul Sherman is a lawyer at the libertarian organization Institute for Justice in Arlington, Virginia. He wrote recent op-eds for The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal looking at the issue of campaign contributions from non-citizens. He says striking down the ban would essentially be an expansion of the Supreme Court’s controversial 2010 ruling in Citizens United vs. FEC.
Journalist and blogger Farai Chideya disagrees with Sherman. She talks about why she not only opposes turning over the ban on foreign campaign contributions, but also the Supreme Court’s ruling on Citizens United.
The story you just read is available to read for free because thousands of listeners and readers like you generously support our nonprofit newsroom. Every day, the reporters and producers at The World are hard at work bringing you human-centered news from across the globe. But we can’t do it without you: We need your support to ensure we can continue this work for another year.
When you make a gift of $10 or more a month, we’ll invite you to a virtual behind-the-scenes tour of our newsroom to thank you for being with The World.