Listen & More
Stations
PRI Stream
Podcasts
Discussions
Mobile
RSS
PRI Widgets and Games
Newsletters
Videos
Join PRI Communities
Facebook YouTube Twitter


Home | Politics & Society | Government | Senate: Unemployment extension for all states

Senate: Unemployment extension for all states

Listen NowListen Now
  • Share
  • Share
  • Share
  • Share
  • Share
  • Share
  • Share
  • Share
nbsp;
image (Image: Flickr user Metro Centric (cc: by-nc-sa))

Currently, only states with jobless rates above 8.5 percent qualify for 13-week extension in benefits for the unemployed.

Story by Manuel Quinones, "Capitol News Connection"

It's an argument between the states. Last month the House passed a 13-week extension in benefits for the unemployed -- but only states with jobless rates above 8.5 percent qualify. Many states, like Maryland fall, short of that.

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) says the restrictions don't make sense. "When I think about it, it just seems a bit unfair, because a man in Georgia is suffering just as much as a man in New York."

Cummings says it's misleading to only look at a state's overall unemployment rate. "There are areas in Baltimore, I would imagine in the 7th Congressional District, where you may have unemployment as much as 20 percent, and it's really sad."

The jobless rate in Baltimore City as a whole is indeed higher than the state's, at more than eleven percent.

Rep. Frank Kratovil (D-MD) says he voted for the House version of the legislation even though it didn't include Maryland. But he says he did so with reservations.

"I had concerns with it and a lot of us did," Kratovil said. "My view was though the fact that Maryland was not included was not a reason to not extend benefits in those states that were over the 8.5 threshold."

Still, Kratovil supports including Maryland and other states once the Senate takes up the issue. And Maryland has a champion in that chamber.

Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD) is just one of many lawmakers who say they want to rectify the situation. "I think probably all states should be included. There are pockets in all states where it’s virtually impossible for people to find employment."

This is an issue that's bringing Democrats and Republicans together. Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD) says he usually wouldn't agree with a benefits extension like this one. But this time, things are different.

"How can you be compassionate and not give people something to put food on the table?" Bartlett said. "So this very conservative Republican who rarely voted to extend unemployment compensation voted this time to extend unemployment compensation because there just aren't jobs out there. That's all. They just aren’t there."

Congress proposes to pay for a benefits extension through a tax on employers. Bartlett does worry about more taxes having a negative effect on businesses. But he does support more Americans getting a benefits extension.

A new compromise in the Senate would do just that. It would extend Federal unemployment benefits nationwide. Meanwhile, states with high unemployment would get a more generous package.

Kratovil says Congress has to draw the line somewhere. "I think it's probably a good idea to perhaps differentiate those with 8.5% or more and those below, you could do it for less time."

Cardin says the bottom line is making sure Maryland and other states like it don't get left out. "We are under extraordinary times; the benefits should be extended to all."

But even if Senate lawmakers pass a compromise, they still have to reconcile their version of the legislation with the more restrictive House version. Senators say they want to vote on the issue as soon as possible.

Created by Bureau Chief and Executive Producer Melinda Wittstock, Capitol News Connection from PRI provides insightful, localized coverage of participating stations' congressional delegations.

More "Capitol News Connection"

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (75 posted):

Chris on 12 October, 2009 03:55:56
avatar
Why on earth didn't N.H. Governor Jeanne Shaheen work out a seperate bill for states under 8.5% and in the interim, pass the initial bill for the states that need it most now???
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
22
Dean Krouse on 12 October, 2009 03:57:55
avatar
I am literally becoming homeless as this slowly makes its way to being voted it. I can't pay for my medication, food, or shelter. I could've never dreamed I would come to this in MY life. I always had work, I am now useless. While they wait to get these checks out to people, those people are loosing their homes! Hurry up please!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
34
Mark on 12 October, 2009 05:55:27
avatar
I do not understand if it passes this week we have to wait until the 25th to claim, that will be 3 weeks without a check if it passes this week we should be able to file this sunday the 18th.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
14
Deity on 12 October, 2009 06:23:07
avatar
chris i agree... they should've passed this bill and made aan mendment to get the 'benefits' to all unemployed people... but this does show exactly how smart politicians are... which it was delayed because jon kyl of the republicans 'hasn't read it yet' and 'in due time' it will pass, i haven't got a check since Sept 1. its been 1-1/2 months and they are debating whether to give it to all states... thats pretty stupid cuz these are humans we are talking about and not demographics on the other side of the paycheck.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
18
Don Jones on 12 October, 2009 08:08:07
avatar
Remember come election time, Congress handed out $700 Billion to their benefactors in the banking industry in just a matter of days. When it comes to bailing out the people, it's a much slower response.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
34
kathy on 12 October, 2009 09:24:15
avatar
Yay !Pass This Bill Immediately !!!!!!!!!!And send more troops to afghanistan and end the stupid war so the economy and country can grow and prosper and Do it like NOW not in 2 weeks or after a nobel peace prize is guiven where are the priorities here gheesh!!!!!The only way we can grow as a country and a Nation is if we are at Peace END THIS STUPID WAR GET ALL THE TROOPS WE CAN OVER THERE AND GET A GRIP ON THE SITUATION SO we can all move on!!!!!!!!!!!!God will bless this country n people Not when we are at war
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
8
Dylan on 12 October, 2009 09:47:51
avatar
It was legislation that was passed in 1999 and in 2004 by almost unanimous consent that overturned legislation put in place by FDR right after the market crashed that lead to the great depression. The legislation seperated commercial banking and investment banking. In essence, preventing a crisis on wall street from dibilitating main street. Thanks to Congress' caving to Wall Street lobbyist over the last 10 years, we are now in the position we are in. To pour salt in the wound, they have used appoximately 17 trillion tax payers money in bailouts and various stimulus progroms trying to fix the problem THEY caused. The audacity of our leadership to drag their feet and stall UI benefits legislation! Sen. Kyl's request for a CBO report over cost concerns is....there are no words to even describe the dispicable actions of our senators. Keep this up and they may incite civil disobedience that will make the LA riots seem like a silent sit in protest. After all, Americans are in this position by no fault of their own. On the contrary, almost entirely the fault of our representatives. Their job was to act in the best interest of the people they represent not the wall street lobbyist who successfully influenced passage of laws in their best interest..ie GREED. To hell with you and your CBO report.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
10
Jeremy on 13 October, 2009 12:31:37
avatar
I ran out in Aug, will I have to re-file all over again when we get word...or will it just appear in my EB that I exhausted already?They already have our info why do we have to keep filling ever 2-3 months it ridiculous.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
7
Joelle on 13 October, 2009 12:40:47
avatar
DITTO.... with Don Jones' comment above.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
3
JimH on 13 October, 2009 02:40:51
avatar
I wish these legislators would realize that bills do absolutely NOTHING until they're passed by both the Senate and The House and signed by the President.

This legislation should have been taken care of 2 months ago before they took their recess. I TOLD them so back in July, but did any of them listen? Of course not. What do they care that at best people will go hungry, and at worst will lose their homes? They've got their jobs, their homes and their meals - why should they care about anyone else?

Hey, I got an idea.... let's start laying THEM off!!!! I don't mean replacing them with someone else - I mean, remove the office entirely!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
19
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next total: 75 | displaying: 1 - 10

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Supported By:
PRI is my network